The glorious weather is tempting me towards lazy days reading on the green however June is almost upon us and I still have plenty to do…
The Performing Worlds event will begin on the 9th June and will continue in various locations throughout Dundee until the 15th (visit http://www.d-air.org/performing-worlds for the full programme). I will be embodying various animal personas during the week and will have a couple of situated performances as well.
The first of these performances will take place at the Camperdown Wildlife Park on Monday 11th and will present the human animal in its destructive capacity, as the most dangerous animal on display at the zoo. The second of which will take place on Friday 15th in the City Square and will be an enquiry into Dundee’s relationships with animals. I will post further details soon so watch this space…
GENERATORprojects members show 2012 is currently open and will be until the 26th of February. It’s a great show this year; lots of high quality work which the GENERATOR team have curated very well into a nicely balanced and interesting exhibition.
My piece, Gallery Cat, is a response to my recent research into animals in art and especially their presence in a gallery. This years members show reflects the boom of the animal as art medium of recent years; including a photo of a dead robin and a taxidermied rooster. The presence of the animal body in a gallery can have a very powerful effect.
My piece however presents the absence of the animal. In the corner of the gallery a cat bed is placed accompanied by a food/water bowl, some toy mice and a used litter tray. White fur clings to the bed and toy mice scattered through the gallery hint at the presence of a cat but there is no cat to be seen.
There were several reasons and considerations behind me exhibitiong this piece as I did (including jokey nods to Tracey Emin and Marcel Duchamp) and I want to leave these open to interpretation, however I have one particular aspect which has been on my mind that I would like to share with you.
In recent years there have been many ethical concerns over artworks which have used live animals in the white cube, including the infamous Exposicion No1 by Guillermo Vargas which an internet petittion gave global coverage and debate to. As the details of the exact treatment of the dog were never confirmed it still remains a mystery as to whether the dog died or escaped, however the legacy of this piece was to open up the discussion of the ethical considerations of using other living beings in art. Since then, to some, it has become abhorrent to have a live animal in a gallery as artwork.I am interested to see what (if any) reaction the mere suggestion of a live animal may cause.
In this case the animal is a cat; often imbued with human qualities of aloofness and independence, would our feelings change if the presence was that of a different animal; say a tiger, or a cow, or a rat?
While at the opening for the show a woman was walking about carrying a small dog. That night the gallery held the presence of a live dog, a dead rooster and an absent cat.
We have shared our homes with animals for thousands of years and although it is easy to think of the city as a purely human domain this is not the case; other species are cohabiting with us in this crowded habitat just as they always have.
Some, like cats, dogs and hamsters etc, we actively chose as our companions, others, such as robins, butterflies etc, we openly invite into parks and gardens for our pleasure, while still others, rats, pigeons and bugs, are unwelcome guests in our homes and streets.
So what determines our relationships with different species of animals and why are some considered ‘pets’ while others are labelled ‘pests’? Why do we engage with some species more than with others and how does this affect our relationship with them? What happens when a species crosses the boundary and is re-categorised?
With these questions in mind I have begun to investigate Dundee’s animal populations. I have been lucky enough to speak to people from the Countryside Ranger service and from Dundee City Councils pest control team, all of whom have been extremely helpful in providing starting points for my explorations.
In the coming weeks I intend to continue these dialogues with a view to creating artworks which open up discussion and create awareness of the diversity of life in Dundee and how we may be able to create and maintain a balance.
London is full of pigeons. It is their perfect environment and they occupy the city in unnatural numbers. Like many other urban animals, pigeons exploit the protection and sustenance the city offers. There is always food to be found, in bins, on the street after bars close or directly from the human hand (sometimes shared, sometimes stolen).
Natural cliff dwellers, city buildings provide the perfect nest sites for pigeons. There is plenty of space so there is little competition for the best nest sites and very few predators. Add to this the warmth and protection from adverse weather that tall buildings and human activity provides and you have the perfect habitat for pigeons.
Finding myself with some free time one day I began to stalk the pigeons. I chose an individual and followed it for as long as I could. When I lost it I would choose another and follow that pigeon instead. I followed as they bobbed along, pecking at cigarette butts and chewing gum on the pavement, as they flitted from bench to branch and back again. I watched them squabble over discarded chips and limp through a forest of commuters’ legs.
As I stalked the pigeons through London I realised I was moving differently to the other people in the street. They walked with purpose; fluidly and rhythmically at speed while I moved slowly, pausing, considering, stepping lightly. I viewed the city through hunters’ eyes, noticing details invisible to the rush of people around me. Aware of the sounds of birds, the smell of spices from an open window nearby and the feel of cobbles beneath my feet, my senses heightened, I moved like a cat across the city with no particular direction. Before long I was lost. It was wonderfully freeing. With no idea where I was I let my instincts lead me until I found the river and was back in familiar territory.
This time meandering through the streets of London allowed me to meditate on city life and our relationships with the animals we share it with (willingly or otherwise). Dundee is of course a lot smaller than London, however its proximity to open countryside as well as the sea allows for a huge diversity of life.
I began to question what exactly our relationships with other animals in the city are; how do we negotiate sharing city space with such diverse creatures? What problems arise from this close proximity? And what does it mean to be an Urban Animal?
“Man is the only creature that refuses to be what he is.”
I have often explored the idea of the “Animal” in my work and the relationship between man and other life has been on my mind recently for one reason or another. As I contemplate the direction my life and my art practice will take in the coming months I feel somewhat compelled to return to this concept to see how I can evolve my thoughts on it and what insights I can gain from exploring it through a freshly developed performative practice.
I find it interesting that such a divide is made between nature and culture and especially between human animals and non human animals. There is often a negative reaction to the notion that man is an animal, as though to acknowledge this is to somehow degrade man. It is seen as an insult by a species which has declared itself privileged among the life on earth.
It seems paradoxical that the same men who will argue adamantly that we evolved from apes will also attest to our apparent elevation from the natural to the cultural. While it seems true that we have “artificially” interfered with our physical evolution through the development of medicine and technology; allowing us to cure diseases and prolong life which may otherwise have altered the human gene pool, these changes merely indicate an alternative direction in our evolution. We are a species of inventive tool users, our tools have just got a bit more complicated over the years.
Culture is natural. The human city is no less natural than a beehive or termite colony. We build ourselves shelters and interact with each other to survive just as all animals do. We are still driven by the same primal instincts that we were millions of years ago; to live and eat and reproduce. It is these drives that are at the heart of all our advances.
Despite this, and to the other extreme, there is often a tendency to villainize man amongst ecological circles; to suggest that we are unworthy compared to other animals as we are “destroying the planet”. This is untrue. We are in the grand scheme of things a blip on the surface of the world, life has existed for millions of years and will continue to exist when we are gone. That is not to say that we aren’t having a significant effect on the species we share the planet with; neither does this give us the right to abuse the planet, but the arrogance of assuming that we could bring about the destruction of life on earth serves only to perpetuate the myth that we are somehow above nature.
We are the biggest danger to our own existence. We should not be worried about destroying the planet but rather about destroying human life on the planet. We need to reconnect to our animality; to see ourselves as part of nature in order to rebalance our relationship with the planet and our relationships with each other. Once we stop seeing the world and the life on it as commodities for our own convenience and allow ourselves to recognise our place in the ecosystem, we can begin to reach an equilibrium with the world we live in.
What is needed it would seem is a re-evaluation and a re-education and then perhaps there will still be a place for the human animal on Earth.